# Carl Miller Enhanced Historical Corpus - REPUGNANCY DOCTRINE

## CORE PRINCIPLE (From Marbury v. Madison, 1803)
> **"Anything that is in conflict with the Supreme Law is NULL AND VOID OF LAW"**
> - Chief Justice John Marshall

> **"For a secondary law to come in conflict with the Supreme Law was illogical, for certainly the Supreme Law would prevail over all other law"**
> - Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

> **"Unconstitutionality would date from the enactment of such a law, not from the date so branded in an open court of law"**
> - Marbury v. Madison

> **"No courts are bound to uphold it, and no citizens are bound to obey it. It operates as a mere nullity, or a fiction of law, which means it doesn't exist in law."**
> - Marbury v. Madison

## CHRONOLOGICAL FOUNDATION (1215-1803-2024)

### 1. Magna Carta (1215) - Foundation of "Law of the Land"
- King John's charter to barons
- Clause 39: "No free man shall be seized...except by the lawful judgment of his equals or by the law of the land"
- Clause 40: "To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice"
- 25-barons security mechanism (proto-checks and balances)

### 2. Mayflower Compact (1620) - Covenant Government
- "Covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick"
- "Enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal Laws...for the General Good"
- Promise of "due Submission and Obedience"

### 3. Marbury v. Madison (1803) - Judicial Review & Supremacy
- Est. that laws conflicting with Constitution are NULL AND VOID FROM INCEPTION
- Chief Justice John Marshall's opinion
- 9 pages of Shepard Citations, never overturned
- Defines repugnancy doctrine definitively

### 4. Carl Miller Teachings (2024) - Modern Application
- Article 6, Paragraph 2 interpretation
- Supremacy Clause enforcement
- Practical courtroom application
- Citizen empowerment strategies

## REPUGNANCY STATISTICS


**Overall:**
- Total Repugnancy Mentions: 45
- Total Nullity Claims: 17
- Total Supremacy References: 28
- Total Historical Precedents: 106
- Total Legal Principles: 32

**By Document:**

- **Unknown**:
  - Repugnancy mentions: 45
  - Nullity claims: 17
  - Historical precedents: 97
  - Legal principles: 32

- **Mayflower_Compact_1620**:
  - Repugnancy mentions: 0
  - Nullity claims: 0
  - Historical precedents: 6
  - Legal principles: 0

- **Marbury_v_Madison_1803**:
  - Repugnancy mentions: 0
  - Nullity claims: 0
  - Historical precedents: 1
  - Legal principles: 0

- **Carl_Miller_Teachings**:
  - Repugnancy mentions: 0
  - Nullity claims: 0
  - Historical precedents: 2
  - Legal principles: 0

## TOPICS IDENTIFIED

- Chronological_Historical_Base: 1 chunks
- Repugnancy_Doctrine: 0 chunks
- Nullity_From_Inception: 0 chunks
- Supremacy_Clause: 0 chunks
- Vested_Rights: 0 chunks
- Judicial_Review: 1 chunks
- Common_Law_Principles: 101 chunks

## KEY MARBURY QUOTES ON REPUGNANCY


## PROCESSING DATE
2026-05-20 17:18:28

## USAGE
This corpus integrates:
1. Historical founding documents (1215-1620)
2. Marbury v. Madison judicial doctrine (1803)
3. Carl Miller's modern application (2024)

Emphasis on REPUGNANCY as the mechanism for identifying null and void laws.
